“ Rostov couldn’t take his mind off the brilliant exploit which, to his astonishment, had won him the St. George’s Cross and a heroic reputation. There was something odd about it. ‘It turns out they’re even more scared that we are,’ he thought. ‘Is this it then? Is this what they mean by heroism? Did I really do it for my country? And what has he done wrong with his dimple and his blue eyes? He was so scared! He thought I was going to kill him. Why should I want to kill him? My hand shook. And they’ve given me the George Cross! I can’t see it, I just can’t see it!’” (War and Peace, Vol. III Pt. 1 Chapter 16)
While walking to Pont du Hoc, the site of an infamously unnecessary (on account of the non-existent weapons “hiding” there) and bloody battle between a special US force and German soldiers, a student asked me what I thought about D-Day. After a day spent in Museums and cemeteries I paused for a minute and chose my words carefully.
“I think that it is often portrayed in an overtly victorious, glorious light, without focusing on the deep human suffering that is occurring on all sides. There is no glory in war, there is only tragedy.” The student nodded, considering my thoughts and responded, “What about heroism, don’t you think there were heroic acts?” I paused again, thinking. “Well, I tend to stay away from the word heroism as I am not really sure what it means. It means something different to each person, and so I try to avoid such an ambiguous and loaded word. But I certainly believe there were individual acts of heroism, during which someone sacrificed his life for a comrade etc. But within the larger schema of the war, the senseless, territorial grab-bag of war, I do not think there is any glory in any of that. I simply see it as a tragedy that these acts of heroism were made necessary.”
Our discussion then veered off to the topic of pacifism, and I never had a chance to ask that student what he imagined when he thought of heroism in the chaotic context of war. Certainly, when I think of a heroic act, I cite a person without any agenda, sacrificing his or her life (if necessary), for another person. I won’t say an innocent person, because really, who is wholly innocent. So, I guess that is my definition. True heroism, does not have an agenda, is not an act of revenge, nor does is it an act violence. In a Christian context then I would cite Jesus as performing the ultimate heroic act in his crucifixion.
Later as we were leaving Colleville-Sur-Mer, the WWII US cemetery in Normandy , I noted these words inscribed upon the wall: “To these we owe the high resolve that the cause for which they died shall live”.
What is this cause for which they died that I am called to carry on? I don’t think there is a simple, clean, universal answer, if an answer exists at all.